What CIOs can do when AI is live and usage is flat
When AI is live and usage is flat, the platform has done its job and the stall has moved to the people and the work. IT can see it first, in the usage data, and gets the blame for it. The fix sits with the leaders who own each team's work, and the CIO can start that conversation.
The question, in the CIO's words
“We delivered the platform on time, with security signed off and single sign-on working. Six months later the usage report is flat, the renewal is coming up, and the business is asking IT why nobody uses it.”
Why a usage report can't settle it
A usage report counts activity in the AI products you licensed. It cannot tell you why the activity is low, and it cannot see AI use elsewhere. In BCG's 2025 AI at Work survey, 54% of respondents said they would use AI tools even if not authorized (BCG, June 2025). So a flat line in your report can sit beside plenty of AI use that your report does not count, and some of it may be outside the data rules you set.
Our article Shadow AI: your staff already wrote your AI strategy treats that unofficial use as a signal worth reading. It shows which tasks people want help with, which tells you where the sanctioned AI needs to be pointed.
Where the return is decided
The AI Profitability Gap™ is the distance between what an organization spends on AI and the commercial return it produces. Underneath it is a chain: Investment, Usage, Direction, Skill and Reinvestment, which together produce Return. IT owns the first two links and reports on them well.
The three conditions that decide the return sit after usage, with other seats. Direction asks whether the AI work is pointed at a number the business already measures. Skill asks whether people can get more from AI than the first obvious use. Reinvestment asks whether anyone has decided what the saved time is for. None of these can be configured from the admin console.
Why this lands on IT, and why IT can't close it alone
The AI products carry IT's name, so the usage number does too. When the number is flat, the first question goes to the people who installed the software. But the reasons people leave AI alone are about their work: nobody pointed it at a task, the first try was disappointing, the process around it did not change, or they are unsure what they may put into it.
IT can fix the last one directly, with plain guidance on data. The rest belong to the CEO, the people leader and the leaders who own each team's work. The CIO is well placed to bring those seats together, because IT holds the usage data, the license costs and the renewal date that everyone else will be asked about.
In the AI Profit Bridge, this is the Profitable Platform row, what your AI investment delivers, working alongside the other two. Its goal is that every AI investment is tied to a clear outcome, or retired.
What to do first
- 1. Pull usage by team and pick the two teams with the widest gap between licenses and active use. Ask their leaders which business number AI was meant to move.
- 2. Publish one page, in plain language, on what data people may put into each AI product. Send it through managers.
- 3. Ask a few teams what AI they use outside the licensed products, and for which tasks.
- 4. Take the free AI Profit Ready Assessment and ask the business leaders who own those teams to take it too. It is eight questions and takes about two minutes.
Questions CIOs ask
Is low AI adoption an IT problem?
Part of it is: data guidance, access and the integration into the software people use every day all sit with IT. The larger part sits with the leaders who decide what AI is for and how the work changes around it.
Should we switch AI vendors if usage is low?
Find out why usage is low first. If the cause is that nobody pointed AI at a task, a new vendor will produce the same usage report a year later. Our page on Copilot and ChatGPT Enterprise launches covers what to fix before the renewal.
Who should own AI adoption after go-live?
The leader who owns each team's work owns that team's adoption. IT owns the platform, the data rules and the usage data, and the CEO owns what the AI spend is for.
Does Average Robot implement or integrate AI tools?
No. We work on the people and the process around the AI you already run. Where the platform itself has to change, we say so and bring in a build partner, and we work alongside your team.
Sources
- BCG, AI at Work 2025 press release, 26 June 2025https://www.bcg.com/press/26june2025-beyond-ai-adoption-full-potential
Next step
Before the renewal, see which condition is holding the return back, from the business side. Eight questions, about two minutes.